Generalized high-energy thermionic electron injection at graphene interface
arXiv:1907.07393 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevApplied.12.014057
The paper presents a full-band theoretical model for thermionic electron emission from graphene, showing that the common Dirac‑cone approximation fails for high‑energy electrons and high barrier heights, which impacts the design of graphene‑based thermionic energy devices.
Abstract
Graphene thermionic electron emission across high-interface-barrier involves energetic electrons residing far away from the Dirac point where the Dirac cone approximation of the band structure breaks down. Here we construct a full-band model beyond the simple Dirac cone approximation for the thermionic injection of high-energy electrons in graphene. We show that the thermionic emission model based on the Dirac cone approximation is valid only in the graphene/semiconductor Schottky interface operating near room temperature, but breaks down in the cases involving high-energy electrons, such as graphene/vacuum interface or heterojunction in the presence of photon absorption, where the full-band model is required to account for the band structure nonlinearity at high electron energy. We identify a critical barrier height, $Φ_B^{(\text{c})} \approx 3.5$ eV, beyond which the Dirac cone approximation crosses over from underestimation to overestimation. In the high-temperature thermionic emission regime at graphene/vacuum interface, the Dirac cone approximation severely overestimates the electrical and heat current densities by more than 50\% compared to the more accurate full-band model. The large discrepancies between the two models are demonstrated using a graphene-based thermionic cooler. These findings reveal the fallacy of Dirac cone approximation in the thermionic injection of high-energy electrons in graphene. The full-band model developed here can be readily generalized to other 2D materials, and shall provide an improved theoretical avenue for the accurate analysis, modeling and design of graphene-based thermionic energy devices.
8 pages, 4 figures