What Maudlin replied to

Abstract

A recent post by Tim Maudlin to this archive (arXiv:1408.1828) was entitled "Reply to Werner". However, it was not clear to what text this was supposed to be a reply. Here I briefly provide this context, and show that Maudlin's post is as ill-conceived as the original paper (arXiv:1408.1826).

5 pages, LaTex; background material not intended for journal publication